<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got Captcha? Antispam on AjaxPatterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns</link>
	<description>Mahemoff's Podcast/Blog - Web, Programming, Usability from the Author of 'Ajax Design Patterns' (AjaxPatterns.org)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mahemoff</title>
		<link>http://softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns/comment-page-1#comment-4934</link>
		<dc:creator>mahemoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 11:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns#comment-4934</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew, Good to hear from you :-). Hadn&#039;t come across Ruse. For other wikis I have planned, I will definitely consider it, as antispam is just something mediawiki has never dealt with effectively, cleaning up is a real pain.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mediawiki does have one major factor in its favour, which is familiarity. With wikipedia on the way to becoming the 2nd most popular site on the web, people instantly see a site that looks like wikipedia and they know its a wiki, how it works etc. Basically, wikipedia==wiki to most people. To be fair, that doesn&#039;t apply to most people who&#039;d consider updating an Ajax wiki, but it&#039;s still a more comfortable interface which invites changes more easily.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For AjaxPatterns, it&#039;s probably impractical due to porting issues - it took about 3 weeks to port to Docbook for the book. But thanks for pointing it out, this could be brilliant for other projects.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, Good to hear from you <img src='http://softwareas.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Hadn&#8217;t come across Ruse. For other wikis I have planned, I will definitely consider it, as antispam is just something mediawiki has never dealt with effectively, cleaning up is a real pain.</p>

<p>Mediawiki does have one major factor in its favour, which is familiarity. With wikipedia on the way to becoming the 2nd most popular site on the web, people instantly see a site that looks like wikipedia and they know its a wiki, how it works etc. Basically, wikipedia==wiki to most people. To be fair, that doesn&#8217;t apply to most people who&#8217;d consider updating an Ajax wiki, but it&#8217;s still a more comfortable interface which invites changes more easily.</p>

<p>For AjaxPatterns, it&#8217;s probably impractical due to porting issues &#8211; it took about 3 weeks to port to Docbook for the book. But thanks for pointing it out, this could be brilliant for other projects.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns/comment-page-1#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwareas.com/got-captcha-antispam-on-ajaxpatterns#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Probably not an option, but have you considered changing the wiki software?
The reason I ask is I saw a post the other day talking about a new Ruby-based wiki called &quot;Ruse&quot; that has features explicitly designed for spam protection.
Have a look at the demo. Might be worth checking out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://onestepback.org/index.cgi/Tech/Ruby/RubyGardenBeta.red&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Andrew.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not an option, but have you considered changing the wiki software?
The reason I ask is I saw a post the other day talking about a new Ruby-based wiki called &#8220;Ruse&#8221; that has features explicitly designed for spam protection.
Have a look at the demo. Might be worth checking out.</p>

<p><a href="http://onestepback.org/index.cgi/Tech/Ruby/RubyGardenBeta.red" rel="nofollow">http://onestepback.org/index.cgi/Tech/Ruby/RubyGardenBeta.red</a></p>

<p>Andrew.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
